<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pearson Draws Criticism From New York to Texas&#8230; Justified? Or Unjustified?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wiredacademic.com/2011/10/pearson-draws-criticism-from-new-york-to-texas-justified-or-unjustified/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wiredacademic.com/2011/10/pearson-draws-criticism-from-new-york-to-texas-justified-or-unjustified/</link>
	<description>Independent news source &#38; thought center for the online education community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:27:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredacademic.com/2011/10/pearson-draws-criticism-from-new-york-to-texas-justified-or-unjustified/#comment-13499</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredacademic.com/?p=944#comment-13499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please consider joining Texans Advocating for Meaningful Student Assessment (TAMSA) --
https://www.facebook.com/tamsatx

The only way to change the system is to unite our voices.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please consider joining Texans Advocating for Meaningful Student Assessment (TAMSA) &#8211;<br />
<a href="https://www.facebook.com/tamsatx" rel="nofollow">https://www.facebook.com/tamsatx</a></p>
<p>The only way to change the system is to unite our voices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://musicindustrycareers.org/music-industry-careers/"</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredacademic.com/2011/10/pearson-draws-criticism-from-new-york-to-texas-justified-or-unjustified/#comment-7207</link>
		<dc:creator>http://musicindustrycareers.org/music-industry-careers/"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 05:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredacademic.com/?p=944#comment-7207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks I have been searching for more data on the subject discussed in this post. again thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks I have been searching for more data on the subject discussed in this post. again thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredacademic.com/2011/10/pearson-draws-criticism-from-new-york-to-texas-justified-or-unjustified/#comment-6073</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 15:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredacademic.com/?p=944#comment-6073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On January 21, 2011, the Texas Education Agency (TEA) received your request for public information. The TEA has included responsive data within the body of this email, and a copy of your original request is included in the string below. Additionally, there are no charges for fulfilling this request and PIR 14637 (Brown) is considered closed. 

Responsive Information: 

The State of Texas Student Assessment costs for 2010-2011 school year is $90,665,041.00 and the total amount will be paid to Pearson.  The amount for the State of Texas Student Assessment contract for 2010-2015 is $468,392,617.00 and again, the total amount will be paid to Pearson.


Please note that you have another open request with the Student Assessment Division, PIR 14681 (Brown), which is currently being processed and for which we will provide a written response to you on or before February 10, 2011.  If you have other requests with the TEA, they have not been assigned to the Student Assessment Division, and you may choose to confirm the status of those requests by writing to pir@tea.state.tx.us.

If you have any questions or wish to discuss PIR 14637 (Brown) further, please contact me at (512) 463-9536 or by email at pir@tea.state.tx.us.

Sincerely,



Jennifer J Eaton
TEA Public Information Coordinator
Enclosure:
Original Request, below
 

This is my response received from Texas Education Agrncy in 2011 following a public information request on the expense of state mandated testing in TX.    One superintendent posted on Texasisd.com that 15,000 teachers&#039; salaries were sacrificed on the altar of state testing with this expense.  Texas State Rep. Dan Flynn filed an amendment on HB 2491 calling for a 2 year moratorium on state testing so the monies could be spent to hire and retain quality teachers.  I was told the Senate chairwoman of the Education Committee struck it from the bill.  Obviously she was more concerned about Pearson than TX teachers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 21, 2011, the Texas Education Agency (TEA) received your request for public information. The TEA has included responsive data within the body of this email, and a copy of your original request is included in the string below. Additionally, there are no charges for fulfilling this request and PIR 14637 (Brown) is considered closed. </p>
<p>Responsive Information: </p>
<p>The State of Texas Student Assessment costs for 2010-2011 school year is $90,665,041.00 and the total amount will be paid to Pearson.  The amount for the State of Texas Student Assessment contract for 2010-2015 is $468,392,617.00 and again, the total amount will be paid to Pearson.</p>
<p>Please note that you have another open request with the Student Assessment Division, PIR 14681 (Brown), which is currently being processed and for which we will provide a written response to you on or before February 10, 2011.  If you have other requests with the TEA, they have not been assigned to the Student Assessment Division, and you may choose to confirm the status of those requests by writing to <a href="mailto:pir@tea.state.tx.us">pir@tea.state.tx.us</a>.</p>
<p>If you have any questions or wish to discuss PIR 14637 (Brown) further, please contact me at (512) 463-9536 or by email at <a href="mailto:pir@tea.state.tx.us">pir@tea.state.tx.us</a>.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Jennifer J Eaton<br />
TEA Public Information Coordinator<br />
Enclosure:<br />
Original Request, below<br />
 </p>
<p>This is my response received from Texas Education Agrncy in 2011 following a public information request on the expense of state mandated testing in TX.    One superintendent posted on Texasisd.com that 15,000 teachers&#8217; salaries were sacrificed on the altar of state testing with this expense.  Texas State Rep. Dan Flynn filed an amendment on HB 2491 calling for a 2 year moratorium on state testing so the monies could be spent to hire and retain quality teachers.  I was told the Senate chairwoman of the Education Committee struck it from the bill.  Obviously she was more concerned about Pearson than TX teachers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Beth Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredacademic.com/2011/10/pearson-draws-criticism-from-new-york-to-texas-justified-or-unjustified/#comment-6053</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Beth Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredacademic.com/?p=944#comment-6053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Is it normal for publicly-traded companies to maximize profits and improve education while doing so?&quot;

I challenge the assertion that Pearson is doing anything to improve education. In large part, today&#039;s students struggle with critical thinking and problem solving skills, and their writing abilities have suffered greatly under the tyranny of the test. I&#039;m all for a free market system where companies make profits, but not when that profit comes at the expense of generations of students in the public education system.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Is it normal for publicly-traded companies to maximize profits and improve education while doing so?&#8221;</p>
<p>I challenge the assertion that Pearson is doing anything to improve education. In large part, today&#8217;s students struggle with critical thinking and problem solving skills, and their writing abilities have suffered greatly under the tyranny of the test. I&#8217;m all for a free market system where companies make profits, but not when that profit comes at the expense of generations of students in the public education system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lara</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredacademic.com/2011/10/pearson-draws-criticism-from-new-york-to-texas-justified-or-unjustified/#comment-6048</link>
		<dc:creator>Lara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredacademic.com/?p=944#comment-6048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The above information is absolutely 100% the truth.  Deeply embedded in NCLB is the right for &#039;for-profit&#039; corporations and shadow education industries to take federal, state, and district funding if schools/districts do not make AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress).  The percentages to meet the standards of AYP are gradually increasing and will be at 100% of all students in all socioeconomic and demographic groups meeting state accountability standards by 2013-2014 school year.

Although I am glad that there is accountability on the forefront on closing the learning and performance discrepancies among diverse demographic/socioeconomic groups of students, the gradual increase in accountability is unobtainable, most especially with the drastic cuts in funding (and of course what funding is left now partially gets distributed to these for-profit organizations!)  Schools with higher poverty/minority rates are feeling the consequences/punishments required by NCLB and those with lower poverty/minority rates will avoid consequences for a little longer.

These companies are LITERALLY buying our politicians and eagerly provide much monetary backing for our politicians to create mandates and additional legalities that promote the use of their companies in public education.

If the public does NOT get a handle on what is going on (with these powerhouse organizations and the skewed information on school choice) the public school system is about to implode and the progress made toward the desegregation of schools is about to diminish.

Be vocal.  Stand up for our children and for the future of our country!  Education IS the hope for our future!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above information is absolutely 100% the truth.  Deeply embedded in NCLB is the right for &#8216;for-profit&#8217; corporations and shadow education industries to take federal, state, and district funding if schools/districts do not make AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress).  The percentages to meet the standards of AYP are gradually increasing and will be at 100% of all students in all socioeconomic and demographic groups meeting state accountability standards by 2013-2014 school year.</p>
<p>Although I am glad that there is accountability on the forefront on closing the learning and performance discrepancies among diverse demographic/socioeconomic groups of students, the gradual increase in accountability is unobtainable, most especially with the drastic cuts in funding (and of course what funding is left now partially gets distributed to these for-profit organizations!)  Schools with higher poverty/minority rates are feeling the consequences/punishments required by NCLB and those with lower poverty/minority rates will avoid consequences for a little longer.</p>
<p>These companies are LITERALLY buying our politicians and eagerly provide much monetary backing for our politicians to create mandates and additional legalities that promote the use of their companies in public education.</p>
<p>If the public does NOT get a handle on what is going on (with these powerhouse organizations and the skewed information on school choice) the public school system is about to implode and the progress made toward the desegregation of schools is about to diminish.</p>
<p>Be vocal.  Stand up for our children and for the future of our country!  Education IS the hope for our future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredacademic.com/2011/10/pearson-draws-criticism-from-new-york-to-texas-justified-or-unjustified/#comment-6046</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredacademic.com/?p=944#comment-6046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is obvious as a parent to children in the Texas Public school system that we are fighting a losing battle with Pearson.  They have taken over our children&#039;s education and will continue to do so until the legislation says &quot;NO!&quot;.  I doubt this will happen in a time where my children will see it.  My 4th grade daughter, who has generalized anxiety disorder has been in a complete frenzy over this test.  Teachers are desperate for them to make great scores on these tests and they convey this in the way they pressure them to get prepared for the test.  I feel sorry for the teachers, who are forced to&quot; teach a test&quot; a all year rather than truly teach our children.  It makes me sick to think I am paying for this ridiculous testing.  It makes me even more irate that I have no rights as a parent to say no.  I was told by the TEA and by the testing coord. in our district (Columbia-Brazoria) that my ONLY right as a parent, when it came to the test was to either send my child to school or not.  I kept my anxiety riddled child home Monday and received a total of 4 panicked calls from the school looking for her.  Starting next year, my children will both be in &quot;pass or fail&quot; years (5th and 8th grade) where if they do not pass the test, they fail the year. No matter their grades on the report card.  This seems silly, to base my child&#039;s education on how well they take a 4 hour standardized test that is designed to trick our children, they fail....the districts have to buy remedial learning tools and tutors from PEARSON.  Public school systems are now only about money and this saddens me greatly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is obvious as a parent to children in the Texas Public school system that we are fighting a losing battle with Pearson.  They have taken over our children&#8217;s education and will continue to do so until the legislation says &#8220;NO!&#8221;.  I doubt this will happen in a time where my children will see it.  My 4th grade daughter, who has generalized anxiety disorder has been in a complete frenzy over this test.  Teachers are desperate for them to make great scores on these tests and they convey this in the way they pressure them to get prepared for the test.  I feel sorry for the teachers, who are forced to&#8221; teach a test&#8221; a all year rather than truly teach our children.  It makes me sick to think I am paying for this ridiculous testing.  It makes me even more irate that I have no rights as a parent to say no.  I was told by the TEA and by the testing coord. in our district (Columbia-Brazoria) that my ONLY right as a parent, when it came to the test was to either send my child to school or not.  I kept my anxiety riddled child home Monday and received a total of 4 panicked calls from the school looking for her.  Starting next year, my children will both be in &#8220;pass or fail&#8221; years (5th and 8th grade) where if they do not pass the test, they fail the year. No matter their grades on the report card.  This seems silly, to base my child&#8217;s education on how well they take a 4 hour standardized test that is designed to trick our children, they fail&#8230;.the districts have to buy remedial learning tools and tutors from PEARSON.  Public school systems are now only about money and this saddens me greatly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Parents</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredacademic.com/2011/10/pearson-draws-criticism-from-new-york-to-texas-justified-or-unjustified/#comment-6045</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Parents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredacademic.com/?p=944#comment-6045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s another important article concerning Pearson, Governor Rick Perry and a man named Sandy Kress.


http://jasonstanford.org/2012/03/staar-chamber/#comment-1960]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another important article concerning Pearson, Governor Rick Perry and a man named Sandy Kress.</p>
<p><a href="http://jasonstanford.org/2012/03/staar-chamber/#comment-1960" rel="nofollow">http://jasonstanford.org/2012/03/staar-chamber/#comment-1960</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conny Jensen</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredacademic.com/2011/10/pearson-draws-criticism-from-new-york-to-texas-justified-or-unjustified/#comment-6040</link>
		<dc:creator>Conny Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 04:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredacademic.com/?p=944#comment-6040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is more on Pearson. http://unitedoptout.com/uncategorized/pearson-alec-and-the-brave-new-world-boycott-now/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is more on Pearson. <a href="http://unitedoptout.com/uncategorized/pearson-alec-and-the-brave-new-world-boycott-now/" rel="nofollow">http://unitedoptout.com/uncategorized/pearson-alec-and-the-brave-new-world-boycott-now/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teri Clifford</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredacademic.com/2011/10/pearson-draws-criticism-from-new-york-to-texas-justified-or-unjustified/#comment-4821</link>
		<dc:creator>Teri Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredacademic.com/?p=944#comment-4821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I included the entire email sans the signature.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I included the entire email sans the signature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wired Academic</title>
		<link>http://www.wiredacademic.com/2011/10/pearson-draws-criticism-from-new-york-to-texas-justified-or-unjustified/#comment-4812</link>
		<dc:creator>Wired Academic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wiredacademic.com/?p=944#comment-4812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Ms. Clifford, Thank you for your comment. Could you email the full email?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ms. Clifford, Thank you for your comment. Could you email the full email?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
