Sloan Survey: Online Enrollment up 10% to 6.1 Million Students
By Wired Academic on November 18, 2011
Blended Learning, Domestic, Faculty, Faculty, Flipped Classrooms, For-Profit, Required, Startups, Universities & Colleges
The annual Sloan survey of online education – Going The Distance - is out now. It shows continued, dramatic growth in online courses nationwide. Take a look at the highlights:
- Over 6.1 million students were taking at least one online course during the fall 2010 term, an increase of 560,000 students over the previous year.
- The 10% growth rate for online enrollments far exceeds the 2% growth in the overall higher education student population.
- Thirty-one percent of higher education students now take at least one course online.
- Reported year-to-year enrollment changes for fully online programs by discipline show most are growing.
- Academic leaders believe that the level of student satisfaction is equivalent for online and face-to-face courses.
- 65% of higher education institutions now say that online learning is a critical part of their long-term strategy.
- There continues to be a consistent minority of academic leaders concerned that the quality of online instruction is not equal to courses delivered face-to-face.
“The rate of growth in online enrollments is ten times that of the rate in all higher education” said study co-author I Elaine Allen, Co-Director of the Babson Survey Research Group and Professor of Statistics & Entrepreneurship at Babson College. “While growth rates have declined somewhat from previous years, we see no evidence that a dramatic slowdown in online enrollments is on the horizon.”
Previously underwritten by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the report has been able to remain independent through the generous support of Pearson, Kaplan University, Inside Higher Ed and the Sloan Consortium. Here’s a link to the full Sloan Report for 2011.
Related Posts
2 Comments
Online courses are a good indication of future learning. Some adults may not be able to attend a traditional university due to family or work obligations. Open coursework will allow them to continue learning at a potential lower cost versus a traditional classroom setting.
Reply
Tips & Pitches
Latest WA Features
-
Trend: Corporate U Employers Offering Just In Time Education To Workers
-
Subterfuge & Skullduggery In The College Rankings Game
-
“Instreamia” Shakes Loose Moss By Launching Spanish Language Mini-MOOC
-
Jörn Loviscach: A German Math Teaching Sensation Emerges On YouTube & Udacity
-
Open University Enters Battle Of The MOOCs, Launches “FutureLearn”
Continuing Education, Cost of Education, Domestic, For-Profit, K-12, Required, Startups, Technology, Universities & Colleges - May 5, 2013 - 0 Comments
Bubble Analysis: Trace Urdan on Why This Era of Ed Investing Could Be Different
More In For-Profit
- A Blended Path? How American Honors Cuts Cost of Four Year Degree by Over a Third
- New For-Profit Alert: RonPaul.edu?
- Uncle Sam Sequester Suspends Tuition Assistance For Soldiers, APEI Quakes
- New Details: University of Phoenix Accreditation Recommended for Probation
- Exclusive: An Ashford University Student Describes Her Frustrations With The Online School
Domestic Education Quality Ethics For-Profit Interview Required Universities & Colleges
Blended Learning, Domestic, Education Quality, Ethics, K-12, Opinion, Personalized Learning, Required, Teachers, Technology, Venture Capital - May 22, 2013 - 0 Comments
Michael Horn: Why Edu Innovation Isn’t About Tech Taking Over Teaching
More In Technology
- Charter Darling KIPP Places Big Data Above Personal Tech In Its Classrooms
- Ryan Craig: Achieving Apple-ish Adoption & Satisfaction in Higher Education
- Columnist Michael Horn: Honoring Clayton Christensen With A New Name & Mission
- How Online Learners Can Quit LOL Cats
- Tom Vander Ark On The Latest Cohort of ImagineK12 Startups
Blended Learning Domestic K-12 Required Startups Technology Venture Capital
Blended Learning, Domestic, Education Quality, Friend, Fraud, or Fishy, K-12, Opinion, Personalized Learning, Public, Required, Startups, Technology, Universities & Colleges - Mar 29, 2013 - 0 Comments
Transformational? The “Ifs, Ands or Buts” About Blended Learning
More In Friend, Fraud, or Fishy
- Terry Heick: Obsolescence, Proliferation & Other Harmful Trends In Education Technology
- Important Early Questions Over Obama’s Early Childhood Program Ambitions
- Should For-Profit Companies Manage K-12 Schools? A Skeptical Review
- A Letter To Sen. Tom Harkin About For-Profit Charter Schools
- Ryan Craig: American Clampdown Forcing Forlorn For-Profit Colleges To Look Abroad
Domestic Education Quality For-Profit Friend, Fraud, or Fishy Graduate International Private Public Regulatory Required Universities & Colleges










10 %v increas is nothing. In the past it was 20 -24 % per year .
In fact the measure is not a good and right one .
” Number of students who take at least one online course .. ” meanningless.
The real measure is ” how many online courses were taken last year in total . ”
Let us assume the equevalent of full time students in the USDA is 18 million .
Since full timers take 10 courses per year then total courses taken per year is 180 million .
Ho0w many of those 180 million courses are ONLINE . That is the measure
Another concept to be measured is
How many fully online programs USA has and how many students are in there ?
Fully online means students do not enter the campus at all .